When
people are talking about sustainable finance, there are two main things they should
consider in both sustainability and financial return. Many academic papers or
investment institutions demonstrated the advantages of sustainable finance,
such as better financial performance (Ortas, et
al., 2015; Lee, et al., 2016; Yadav, et al., 2016) and risk reduction (Jansson
& Biel, 2011; Morgan Stanley, 2019). While Lean & Nguyen (2014) and
Cunha et al. (2020) argue that in the period of crisis, sustainable finance
present a inferior return and risk performance. These researches express
positive signs to investors, sustainable finance not only has better financial
performance but also could achieve self-value of investors. But form the
perspective of investment institutions, sustainable finance means they have to
hire more sophisticate and cost more in human capital for meeting both the
criteria of financial return and social return at the same time.
Note: European Union Action Plan on Sustainable
Finance. Sources from if irish funds: ESG Newsletter 2019
Meanwhile, Juravle & Lewis (2009) emphasis that sustainable
finance belong to long-term investment, so short-termism investor and manager
are hard to achieve expected returns or short-term goals. Even majority of
investors and managers show their believe is sustainability performance matters
more, social return usually compromise when it is conflict with financial
return: for bad financial performance sustainable finance, half investors would
not accept it, 60% of managers are willing to divest it (Unruh, et al., 2016). The core of sustainable
finance seems to have shifted from 'focus on sustainability' to 'focus on a
profitable sustainability'. Varying definition of sustainable finance allow
investors and managers to set or alter their particular 'sustainability'. If
cannot bring expected financial return, they can lower the weighted of 'sustainability' and increase the proportion of conventional investment in
portfolio. Or, they could even through green-washing, legalize those
non-sustainable investment projects. For social return, it is a difficult
factor to quantify. Dumas & Louche (2016) and Unruh, et al. (2016) believe
for showing the value of sustainable finance more directly, more analytics and
sophisticated modeling are required, then allow investors to estimate whether a
sustainable project can meet their expectations.
References
Cunha, F. A. F. d. S. et al., 2020.
Can sustainable investments outperform traditional benchmarks? Evidence from
global stock markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), p.
682–697.
Dumas,
C. & Louche, C., 2016. Collective Beliefs on Responsible Investment. Business
& Society, 55(3), p. 427–457.
Jansson,
M. & Biel, A., 2011. Motives to engage in sustainable investment: A
comparison between institutional and private investors. Sustainable
Development, 19(2), pp. 135-142.
Juravle,
C. & Lewis, A., 2009. The role of championship in the mainstreaming of
Sustainable Investment (SI) what can we learn from SI pioneers in the United
Kingdom. Organization & Environment, 22(1), pp. 75-98.
Lean,
H. H. & Nguyen, D. K., 2014. Policy uncertainty and performance
characteristics of sustainable investments across regions around the global
financial crisis. Applied Financial Economics, 24(21), pp. 1367-1373.
Lee,
K.-H., Cin, B. C. & Lee, E. Y., 2016. Environmental Responsibility and Firm
Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model.
Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(1), pp. 40-53.
Morgan
Stanley, 2019. Sustainable Reality, s.l.: Morgan Stanley.
Ortas,
E., Álvarez, I. & Garayar, A., 2015. The Environmental, Social,
Governance, and Financial Performance Effects on Companies that Adopt the
United Nations Global Compact. Sustainability, 7(2), pp. 1932-1956.
Unruh,
G. et al., 2016. Investing for a sustainable future: Investors care more about
sustainability than many executives believe. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(4).
Yadav,
P. L., Han, S. H. & Rho, J. J., 2016. Impact of Environmental Performance
on Firm Value for Sustainable Investment: Evidence from Large US Firms. Business
Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), pp. 402-420.
Comments
Post a Comment